Forums

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages 
DNA Traces Origin of Domestic Cat

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fortean Times Message Board Forum Index -> New Science
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
WhistlingJackOffline
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Total posts: 4298
Location: The Sewers of The Strand
Age: 10
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 29-06-2007 11:37    Post subject: DNA Traces Origin of Domestic Cat Reply with quote

Quote:
DNA traces origin of domestic cat

Domestic cats around the world can trace their origins back to the Middle East's Fertile Crescent, according to a genetic study in Science journal.


They may have been domesticated by early farming communities, experts say.

But the study suggests the progenitors of today's cats split from their wild counterparts more than 100,000 years ago - much earlier than once thought.

At least five female ancestors from the region gave rise to all the domestic cats alive today, scientists believe.

The earliest archaeological evidence of cat domestication dates back 9,500 years, when cats were thought to have lived alongside humans in settlement sites in Cyprus.

However, the new results show the house cat lineage is far older. Ancestors of domestic cats are now thought to have broken away from their wild relatives and started living with humans as early as 130,000 years ago.

The researchers focused on DNA in the mitochondria, the power plants of cells which supply energy and have their own genetic material.

Comparison of the genetic sequences enabled researchers to determine the relationships between different cat lineages.

The scientists found the cats fell into distinctive genetic "clades", or groups.

The results show that, apart from accidental cross-breeding, European wildcats are not part of the domestic moggy's family tree.

Neither are the Central Asian wildcat, the Southern African wildcat, or the Chinese desert cat.

But domestic cats formed a clade with some wildcats from the Middle East, suggesting that today's moggy stems from the wild felines of this region.

Experts believe cats originally sought out human company, attracted by rodents infesting the first agricultural settlements.

The early farmers of the fertile crescent - present-day Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Israel - would have found the animals extremely useful for protecting their grain stores - an association that continues to this day.

"The felidae family is well known as a successful predator - very deadly, very ferocious, very threatening to all species including humankind," said co-author Stephen O'Brien, of the US National Cancer Institute.

"But this little guy actually chose not to be that," he said, "he actually chose to be a little bit friendly and also was a very good mouser."

The study included researchers from the UK, the US, Germany, Israel, Spain and France.

Story from BBC NEWS:

Published: 2007/06/28 19:42:45 GMT

© BBC MMVII
Back to top
View user's profile 
ramonmercadoOffline
Psycho Punk
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Total posts: 21099
Location: Dublin
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 18-12-2013 13:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
When Cats Became Comrades
16 December 2013 3:15 pm
http://news.sciencemag.org/archaeology/2013/12/when-cats-became-comrades

Fated feline. Bones found in an ancient Chinese farming village (inset) may belong to descendants of the Near Eastern wildcat (pictured).

(photo) Sonelle, taken at the Johannesburg Zoo, South Africa; (inset) Y.Hu et al., PNAS Early Edition (2013)

Fated feline. Bones found in an ancient Chinese farming village (inset) may belong to descendants of the Near Eastern wildcat (pictured).

Cats have been part of human society for nearly 10,000 years, but they weren’t always string-chasers and lap-sitters. Ancient felines hunted crop-destroying rats and mice for early farmers, and in return we provided food and protection. At least that’s what scientists have long speculated. Now, they can back it up. Cat bones unearthed in a 5000-year-old Chinese farming village indicate that the animals consumed rodents and that some may have been cared for by humans. The findings provide the earliest hard evidence of this mutually beneficial relationship between man and cat.

The book of cat domestication is missing a few pages. The oldest record of cats entering human society comes from an early farming village known as Shillourokambos, located on the southern coast of the Mediterranean island of Cyprus. In 2001, researchers led by Jean-Denis Vigne, now director of research at the French National Centre for Scientific Research in Paris, discovered the shared grave of a human and feline underneath an ancient home. The skeleton of the animal—dated to 9500 years ago—was surrounded by carved seashells, indicating that cats held a special status in this society. Indeed, Vigne and others have argued that felines were important to the survival of such villages, whose large surpluses of grain attracted armies of rodents; the tamest cats, meanwhile, cozied up to humans, self-domesticating themselves over the course of thousands of years. Yet, there was no solid evidence for this hypothesis, and cats largely vanished from the historical record until about 4000 years ago, when they began to appear on the tomb paintings of ancient Egypt.

The new study fills in some of that missing history. A team of archaeologists excavating an ancient settlement known as Quanhucun in central China has found eight cat bones—a pelvis, a mandible, and other pieces, all dating to about 5300 years ago—scattered among other animal bones, pottery fragments, and stone tools in garbage pits around the site. The villagers, perhaps a thousand strong, were successful millet farmers—and they clearly had a pest problem. The researchers unearthed rodent burrows tunneled into grain storage pits and v-shaped ceramic vessels the size of giant flower vases, likely designed to keep stored grain out of the mouths of scavengers. The inhabitants’ best weapon against these rodents, however, may have been cats.

When the team analyzed the bones of the felines, it discovered forms—or isotopes—of carbon and nitrogen that indicated that the cats ate small animals, which themselves had eaten grain. Based on other bones found at the site, those animals were likely rodents, the researchers report online today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The species of the cats is unclear. But the size and shape of the remains indicates they may belong to the genus Felis, which encompasses several species of small felines, including the Near Eastern wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica), believed to be the ancestor of today’s housecat.

While these animals were protecting crops, villagers may have returned the favor. One of the cats had an unusually high level of grain in its diet. “That’s unexpected because cats are obligate carnivores,” says team member Fiona Marshall, a zooarchaeologist at Washington University in St. Louis. “It suggests that this cat was eating human food.”

Another cat was an older individual, perhaps about 6 years old based on the wear of its teeth, Marshall says. “For a wildcat, it’s very rare to have teeth so worn, so old,” says Vigne, who was not involved in the study. “The most acceptable interpretation is that this cat was taken care of by people. I’m convinced that there was a tight connection between humans and cats at this time in China.”

“Scientists have long suspected that cats were drawn to early farming settlements because of rodents and human refuse, but there’s never been actual evidence to test this hypothesis,” Marshall says. “That’s what’s exciting about these new data. We’re finally seeing the mechanisms behind feline domestication.”

“This is a super-interesting opening chapter,” says Carlos Driscoll, whose genetic sequencing of hundreds of wild and domestic cats in 2007 pegged Felis silvestris lybica as the ancestor of today’s housecats. “But it’s just the beginning of the conversation.” For one thing, he notes that the Quanhucun cats were found in the trash, rather than buried with pomp like the Cyprus cat was. “That raises the possibility that these animals weren’t pets at all. They may have been eaten or used for their fur.”

The species also makes a big difference, says Driscoll, the WWF chair in conservation genetics at the Wildlife Institute of India in Dehradun. If the Quanhucun cats are lybica, they made it from the Near East to China thousands of years earlier than thought, possibly along ancient trade routes. But that also means that the cats were already tame, and that the Chinese farmers played little role in their domestication. It’s also possible, he says, that the Quanhucun cats were a different species of feline—perhaps jungle cats (Felis chaus) or leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis)—that were domesticated independently in China. Because the DNA of these creatures is different from that found in modern housecats, however, these animals either died out or were overtaken by domestic cats from the Near East.

Vigne is now working with the Chinese team to sequence the DNA of the cat bones. If the animals were wildcats, he says, it means that farming was critical to the domestication of the cat, and that this turn of events may have happened more than once. “In different places in the world, you have this same process going on. It strengthens our view of what led to this more intense relationship between humans and cats.” It also means something more fundamental: The rise of human civilization was destined to give rise to the housecat.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fortean Times Message Board Forum Index -> New Science All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group