Forums

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages 
BBC's Jane Standley?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fortean Times Message Board Forum Index -> Conspiracy - The War on Terror
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wowsah156
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 13:09    Post subject: BBC's Jane Standley? Reply with quote

Has anyone seen the clip of Jane Standley reporting on the collapse of Building 7 on 9/11 before it actually collapsed? Who told Standley the building was going to collapse?
Back to top
Rrose_SelavyOffline
Exquisite Elemental
Joined: 07 Jan 2003
Total posts: 1940
Location: Stranded in Sub-Atomica
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 13:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh come on. there's a thread or three already this sort of stuff.

You haven't seen the clip even if it existed it would mean nothing -is there any real evidence she was particular prescient? so what if she was expecting the building to fall - Maybe a firefighter told her - big deal. Or maybe a BBC reporter is in on it as well as she doesn't seem to have exposed the alleged biggest cover up story of her career while reporting on the post 911 events? She missed that one it seems.

I hear the sound of a barrel being scraped.
Back to top
View user's profile 
ramonmercadoOffline
Psycho Punk
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Total posts: 17931
Location: Dublin
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 14:08    Post subject: Reply with quote

I own up!

I made a mistake!

I was one of the Illuminatti PR flacks on 9/11 and I gave out the news of the collapse prematurely. Because of one little error I was demoted to keeping an eye on you lot.
Back to top
View user's profile 
crunchy5Offline
Great Old One
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Total posts: 1951
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 14:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

This report you mean

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/260207building7.htm

Quote:
BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
Revealing, shocking video shows reporter talking about collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background, Google removes clip

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 (UPDATED 5:36AM CST)


An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.

Minutes before the actual collapse of the building is due, the feed to the reporter mysteriously dies.



This amazing clip was on Google Video (now back again here), but was removed within hours of the story breaking. However, hundreds of people had already managed to download the clip and it has gone viral on the Internet and the censors won't be able to shut the lid this time. A You Tube upload is available here but we fully expect this to be removed soon. You can watch it for the time being at this link and also here. A WMV link is here (on our server) and a Quicktime here. Bit torrent versions of the file can be found here. An avi version can be found here.

To be clear, the Salomon Brothers Building is just a different name for Building 7 or WTC 7. Skip forward to around the 14:30 minute mark.

Although there is no clock or time stamp on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm. While the exact time of the report cannot be confirmed at present, it is clear from the footage that the reporter is describing the collapse of WTC 7 while it clearly remains standing behind her in the live shot.

Back to top
View user's profile 
Pietro_Mercurios
Heuristically Challenged
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 15:44    Post subject: Reply with quote

crunchy5 wrote:
This report you mean

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/260207building7.htm

...

How very odd.

http://prisonplanet.com/Pictures/feb07/260207WTC_BBC3.jpg
http://prisonplanet.com/Pictures/feb07/260207WTC_BBC3.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile 
Jerry_BOffline
Great Old One
Joined: 15 Apr 2002
Total posts: 8265
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 15:57    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Although there is no clock or time stamp on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm.


Hmm - so for some reason the clock isn't being shown on the clip. So we only have the word of the 'source' for what the time actually was when the clip was orginally broadcast. So it's odd that the clock is missing from the clip, IMHO.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Pietro_Mercurios
Heuristically Challenged
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 15:59    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jerry_B wrote:
Quote:
Although there is no clock or time stamp on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm.


Hmm - so for some reason the clock isn't being shown on the clip. So we only have the word of the 'source' for what the time actually was when the clip was orginally broadcast. So it's odd that the clock is missing from the clip, IMHO.

Clock, or no clock, Standley is still talking about the collapse of Building 7, as if it had already fallen, whilst it is apparently, quite clearly, still standing behind her. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile 
Rrose_SelavyOffline
Exquisite Elemental
Joined: 07 Jan 2003
Total posts: 1940
Location: Stranded in Sub-Atomica
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 16:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

Probably the building was expected to collapse (which it was) and amid the confusion of the day, with the need for scoops , that got turned into it having just happened. The BBC isn't infallible you know.
-


-
Back to top
View user's profile 
Pietro_Mercurios
Heuristically Challenged
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 16:36    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rrose_Selavy wrote:
Probably the building was expected to collapse (which it was) and amid the confusion of the day, with the need for scoops , that got turned into it having just happened. The BBC isn't infallible you know.

...

Odd, nonetheless.
Back to top
View user's profile 
ted_bloody_maulOffline
Great Old One
Joined: 23 May 2003
Total posts: 4877
Location: Quester's Psykick Dancehall
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 17:23    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did anybody else report this (pre)event in the same way or is it just the beeb who's in on the big con?
Back to top
View user's profile 
Jerry_BOffline
Great Old One
Joined: 15 Apr 2002
Total posts: 8265
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 17:25    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see why this is at all odd - unless you expect journalists to be all-knowing, all-seeing. Trying to dress it up as something else is, IMHO, rather daft.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
ted_bloody_maulOffline
Great Old One
Joined: 23 May 2003
Total posts: 4877
Location: Quester's Psykick Dancehall
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 17:36    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jerry_B wrote:
I don't see why this is at all odd - unless you expect journalists to be all-knowing, all-seeing. Trying to dress it up as something else is, IMHO, rather daft.


Well i'm sure there's an explanation for it which doesn't involve prior knowledge of a conspiracy but until that evidence is presented i'd say you'd have to expect journalists to be all-knowing and all-seeing to break a story in this way.
Back to top
View user's profile 
ginoideOffline
Great Old One
Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Total posts: 999
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 17:46    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think it's just a case of bad reporting, due to the chaos of those moments and the impossibility of getting in touch with trustworthy sources. she probably didn't even know which building she was talking about - after all, it wasn't a landmark like the towers; i think all of us, except maybe for those who live in NYC, became familiar with the infamous building after 9/11. she was probably told "the building is about to collapse" and assumed that it did
Back to top
View user's profile 
ElishevaBarsabeOffline
Really?!
Great Old One
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Total posts: 942
Location: in the fog
Gender: Female
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 18:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

ted_bloody_maul wrote:
Did anybody else report this (pre)event in the same way or is it just the beeb who's in on the big con?


Yes, at the time, I did hear an American reporter commenting on the collapse of Building 7 before it happened. So, my guess is that they'd been told that the building was in danger of collapsing, or that the reporters simply confused the building numbers.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
wowsah156
PostPosted: 27-02-2007 19:08    Post subject: Reply with quote

If this is the case then the explosives planted in building 7 were placed long before the 11th. Therefore pre-knowledge of the plane attacks.

Curious. I would love Standley and the BBC to explain the source .
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fortean Times Message Board Forum Index -> Conspiracy - The War on Terror All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 1 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group