Forums

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages 
The March of Technology
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 30, 31, 32, 33  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fortean Times Message Board Forum Index -> Mainstream News Stories
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 16-07-2013 10:23    Post subject: Reply with quote

rynner2 wrote:
Still going strong:[/i]

Skylon spaceplane engine concept achieves key milestone
By Jonathan Amos, Science correspondent, BBC News

The UK company developing an engine for a new type of spaceplane says it has successfully demonstrated the power unit's enabling technology.
Reaction Engines Ltd (REL) of Culham, Oxfordshire, ran a series of tests on key elements of its Sabre propulsion system under the independent eye of the European Space Agency (Esa).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20510112

19,000mph 'spaceplane' gets Government funding to spark UK space race
The Government is to kick off a UK space race by announcing £60m of funding for a revolutionary new rocket engine.
By Andrew Trotman
12:01AM BST 16 Jul 2013

David Willetts, Minister for Universities and Science, will reveal the investment in SABRE, a British-designed engine.
SABRE’s creator, Reaction Engines, wants to use the technology on a unique “spaceplane” called Skylon, which will be capable of taking people to Earth’s stratosphere in just 15 minutes. It could also fly from the UK to Australia in four hours.

[Computer animation video - about 7 minutes. No talk, just simple captions and good music!]
Skylon is designed to take off from a standard runway before accelerating to speeds of 19,000 miles per hour.

“SABRE has the potential to completely transform how we access space,” Mr Willets, who hopes the technology will create 21,000 jobs, will say at the UK Space Conference in Glasgow.
By supporting this breakthrough technology we are giving the UK a leading position in a growing market of new generation launchers and removing one of the main barriers to the growth of commercial activity in space.”

Skylon is likely to be viewed by Sir Richard Branson as a competitior to his Virgin Galactic business. Hundreds of people have so far paid £121,000 each to experience six minutes of weightlessness during one of Sir Richard’s sub-orbital spaceflights. However, unlike Skylon, the billionaire’s spacecraft is launched from a larger plane and not directly from a runway.

The Government will today also award a £134m contract to Astrium to develop instruments for the next generation of weather satellites.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/10181438/19000mph-spaceplane-gets-Government-funding-to-spark-UK-space-race.html

Wherever he is now, I reckon Dan Dare will have a broad smile on his face! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 16-07-2013 11:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

rynner2 wrote:
Computational photography: the snap is only the start
By Leo Kelion, Technlogy reporter

Imagine a camera that allows you to see through a crowd to get a clear view of someone who would otherwise be obscured, a smartphone that matches big-budget lenses for image quality, or a photograph that lets you change your point of view after it's taken.

The ideas may sound outlandish but they could become commonplace if "computational photography" lives up to its promise.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23235771

Lytro camera launches in the UK: focus after you shoot
The Lytro light field camera, which allows users to refocus their shots after taking them, has launched in the UK for the first time.
By Matt Warman, Consumer Technology Editor
10:44AM BST 16 Jul 2013

Light-field, or plenoptic, cameras capture more light than traditional models by using an array of micro lenses. They can therefore allow an image to be refocused after it has been taken, or to create ‘living images’ that can be refocused long after they were first captured.

The Lytro camera launched in America last year, and features an 8x optical zoom and f/2 lens in a rectangular [housing]. It will be available from next week from £399 for an 8GB model in Harrods, Dixons Travel and John Lewis online.
The camera also offers a selection of filters, and wireless connection to an iPhone app. A 16GB version is also available for £469.

Initial reviews of the Lytro praised the idea, but criticised the low resolution of the images. Writing on The Verge, David Pierce said “There’s no doubt in my mind that Light Field cameras are the future of photography, or at least part of the future. Light Field photography gives you photos that are so immersive and manipulable that it’s quickly easy to forget that 2D photos are useful at all, and the technology is only going to get better as the processing ability and software in the cameras get more powerful and mature. But the first iteration of the Lytro isn’t quite there yet: it’s hard to use, its display is terrible, and outside of a few particular situations its photos aren’t good enough to even be worth saving.” Shocked

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10181922/Lytro-camera-launches-in-the-UK-focus-after-you-shoot.html
Back to top
View user's profile 
Ronson8Offline
Things can only get better.
Great Old One
Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Total posts: 6061
Location: MK
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 16-07-2013 13:23    Post subject: Reply with quote

rynner2 wrote:


[Computer animation video - about 7 minutes. No talk, just simple captions and good music!]
where is the animation video?
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 16-07-2013 15:23    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ronson8 wrote:
rynner2 wrote:


[Computer animation video - about 7 minutes. No talk, just simple captions and good music!]
where is the animation video?

Ah, I see the prob! There are two videos on this page:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/10181438/19000mph-spaceplane-gets-Government-funding-to-spark-UK-space-race.html

- the 7 minute animation one is the 2nd one.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Ronson8Offline
Things can only get better.
Great Old One
Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Total posts: 6061
Location: MK
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 16-07-2013 16:11    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, there was no mention of heat shielding , one wonders if they've found something better than the tiles used on the shuttle.
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 16-07-2013 23:37    Post subject: Reply with quote

rynner2 wrote:
Robocars will take us out of driver’s seat
Germany is leading the global race to build self-driving cars, reports Jeevan Vasagar.
By Jeevan Vasagar
9:00PM BST 09 Jun 2013

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/10108638/Robocars-will-take-us-out-of-drivers-seat.html


Driverless cars to be tested on UK roads by end of 2013

Driverless cars will be tested on public roads by the end of 2013, says the UK government.
So far, UK trials of the autonomous vehicles have taken place only on private land.

Driverless cars are guided by a system of sensors and cameras and are seen as potentially safer and more efficient than regular vehicles.
As a safety measure, a back-up driver will ride along during tests who can take over in case of emergency.

The plans have been unveiled in a blueprint by the Department for Transport, as part of a £28bn investment in British roads to reduce congestion. The report says driverless vehicles are capable of driving on their own "using knowledge of the environment in which they are driving".
"They maintain a safe distance from the vehicle in front at a set speed and without deviating from their lane - all without the driver's input," said the report.

For now, the cars will be driven on lightly-used rural and suburban roads in a "semi-autonomous" mode which gives human passengers the choice to intervene.

They will be tested by the same team of Oxford University researchers who have been developing and testing autonomous car technology on an adapted Nissan Leaf around Oxford Science Park.
The technology uses lasers and small cameras to memorise regular journeys like the commute or the school run.

Prof Paul Newman, who leads the Oxford team, told the BBC he was excited by the public trials in the UK. "It's a great area to be working in because it's IT and computers and that's what changes things. The British government sees that engineering is important."

The UK announcement follows public trials in other parts of the world. The US is leading the way, with three states - Nevada, Florida and California - all passing legislation around autonomous cars.

Google has led efforts in the private sector, with its fleet of prototypes of a converted Toyota Prius covering more than 300,000 miles on public roads.
Google co-founder Sergey Brin said he believed the self-driving car would "dramatically improve the quality of life for everyone", and that it would be commercially available within the decade.
Prof Newman acknowledged that Google were "trailblazers" but added: "They're not the only game in town."

Although initiatives so far have focused on adapting existing cars, many leading car makers including Ford, Audi and Volvo have also expressed their interest in developing the technology as the cost comes down, potentially paving the way for widespread use in mid-range vehicles.

They link an array of technologies inside the vehicle such as lane keep assist, advanced intelligent cruise control and advanced emergency braking in a so-called "sensor fusion".

Paul Watters, head of roads policy at the AA, urged caution.
"In the past our members have expressed concern about fully autonomous cars, preferring human interaction," he told the BBC.
"The notion of reading the newspapers and drinking a cup of coffee is a bit far-fetched. It's early days and driverless cars won't be mainstream for a long time."
"But we have a variety of in-car technologies already, including guided parking and adaptive cruise control, so fully driverless cars will be the culmination of a gradual evolution, not an overnight revolution."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23330681
Back to top
View user's profile 
Ronson8Offline
Things can only get better.
Great Old One
Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Total posts: 6061
Location: MK
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 16-07-2013 23:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can't be any worse than some of the loons we have driving around here.
Back to top
View user's profile 
gncxxOffline
King-Size Canary
Great Old One
Joined: 25 Aug 2001
Total posts: 13561
Location: Eh?
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 16-07-2013 23:49    Post subject: Reply with quote

With any luck it'll put Jeremy Clarkson out of a TV job.
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 17-07-2013 11:01    Post subject: Reply with quote

gncxx wrote:
With any luck it'll put Jeremy Clarkson out of a TV job.

Er, no...

Jeremy Clarkson becomes one of highest paid presenters in BBC history

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10183784/Jeremy-Clarkson-becomes-one-of-highest-paid-presenters-in-BBC-history.html

Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 17-07-2013 11:06    Post subject: Reply with quote

Elon Musk to reveal 'Hyperloop' design on 12 August
Details of a new 'fifth form' of transport, known as Hyperloop will be revealed by SpaceX founder Elon Musk next month
By Sophie Curtis
3:53PM BST 16 Jul 2013

Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX and Tesla Motors, has announced on Twitter that the “alpha design” of his fabled Hyperloop will be revealed on 12 August, and that the project will be open source.

First announced in July 2012, Hyperloop is a hypothetical “fifth mode” of transport, intended as an alternative to boats, planes, cars and trains. Musk has previously described it as a “cross between a Concorde and a rail gun and an air hockey table”.

The system would, in theory, be able to travel from downtown Los Angeles to downtown San Francisco in under 30 minutes, or 343 miles at more than 685mph. It would not need rails but could work either below or above ground, according to Musk.

In a conversation with his Twitter followers on Monday, Musk confirmed that Hyperloop would be open source, stating: “I really hate patents unless critical to company survival”.

Musk also revealed that the “pod” will be about 2 metres in diameter, and that he is willing to work with partners on developing the system, as long as they share the philosophical goal of “breakthrough tech done fast & w/o wasting money on BS”.

The Hyperloop is expected to cost around $6 billion (£3.98bn). However, this is less than a tenth of the cost of a proposed high speed railway between the two cities, which is projected to cost $69 billion.

Musk is no stranger to ambitious transportation projects. In September 2009, SpaceX's Falcon 1 rocket became the first privately funded liquid-fuelled vehicle to put a satellite into Earth orbit.
SpaceX has also been selected by NASA to be part of the first programme that entrusts private companies to deliver cargo to the International Space Station.

Meanwhile, Tesla Motors gained widespread attention in 2008, when it produced the first fully electric sports car, known as the Roadster, which ran on lithium-ion battery cells. It later went on to develop the Model S, a fully electric luxury sedan.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10183135/Elon-Musk-to-reveal-Hyperloop-design-on-12-August.html

Sounds more exciting than the Segway, anyhow! Wink
Back to top
View user's profile 
CarlosTheDJOffline
Dazed and confused for so long its not true
Great Old One
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Total posts: 1927
Location: Sussex
Age: 37
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 17-07-2013 16:41    Post subject: Reply with quote

rynner2 wrote:
gncxx wrote:
With any luck it'll put Jeremy Clarkson out of a TV job.

Er, no...

Jeremy Clarkson becomes one of highest paid presenters in BBC history

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10183784/Jeremy-Clarkson-becomes-one-of-highest-paid-presenters-in-BBC-history.html

Evil or Very Mad


Probably because he presents one of the most popular TV shows IN THE WORLD.
Back to top
View user's profile 
gncxxOffline
King-Size Canary
Great Old One
Joined: 25 Aug 2001
Total posts: 13561
Location: Eh?
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 17-07-2013 18:45    Post subject: Reply with quote

On second thoughts, Clarkson not driving his motors will probably mean he has more time to sit in the passenger seat spouting his carefully scripted ad libs.
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 11-08-2013 08:01    Post subject: Reply with quote

More on the Hyperloop:

Inside the Hyperloop: the pneumatic travel system faster than the speed of sound
It is called “The Hyperloop” and, according to the designer, it will be a revolutionary “fifth mode” of transport, eclipsing trains, planes, boats and automobiles.
By Nick Allen, Los Angeles
6:39PM BST 10 Aug 2013

The “cross between Concorde, a rail gun and an air hockey table” will deliver passengers between US cities faster than the speed of sound.

The history of transport is replete with dreamers who have concocted such schemes for getting people from A to B in previously unimagined haste. And many of them have remained just that, impractical ideas on a drawing board that will never see the light of day.

But the latest mysterious project, which has had the technology world buzzing for months, has one crucial difference. Its backer is a Silicon Valley wunderkind with a proven track record of turning science fiction into reality.
Billionaire Elon Musk’s CV is impressive, to say the least. He made his initial fortune from PayPal, the online secure payment system, before going on to launch spaceships. Last year his SpaceX venture became the first private operation to dock a cargo capsule with the International Space Station.

Back on Earth, Mr Musk also founded Tesla, which has made electric sports cars viable and profitable.
The mercurial, fictional character of Tony Stark, played by Robert Downey Jr in the Iron Man films, is reputedly based on him.

So when Mr Musk, 42, announced that he would be publishing plans for the Hyperloop on Monday, August 12 - tomorrow - scientists were sent into a tailspin.

They will have to wait for Mr Musk to post his “alpha design” on the internet then but he has dropped several hints about its features, including that the system will be powered by solar panels.
Mr Musk will not be patenting the design and it will be “open source”, meaning anyone can modify it, or try to build it.

The fevered speculation about what it would actually look like has ranged from wild theories on Star Trek-style teleportation to more achievable ones involving cars being pushed through vacuum sealed tunnels using magnets.
Mr Musk has denied it will be a so-called “vactrain”, a concept that is already being pursued by a company in Colorado. His idea “does involve a tube, but not a vacuum tube”, he said, adding: “Not frictionless, but very low friction.”

In recent weeks a large part of the mystery appeared to have been solved. A technology enthusiast in Canada called John Gardi published a diagram of how the Hyperloop might work. He went on to ask Mr Musk on Twitter: “Can you give me some basic clues? What diameter of tube so I can start designing stations and throughways?”
To his extreme surprise Mr Musk replied: “Your guess is the closest I’ve seen anyone guess so far. Pod diameter probably around 2m.”

Mr Gardi, who describes himself modestly as a “tinkerer”, came up with a tunnel 9ft in diameter, raised above the ground on pylons. His tube could be made from materials already used for sewer pipes. It would form a continuous loop between two destination points. Giant turbines would blast a stream of air into the tube. The two-metre wide pods, carrying people, would be moved by a rail gun - a tube that uses magnets to accelerate material passing along it.
As they approach their journey’s end they would be routed out of the air stream and slowed down using a magnetic braking system.

In an extensive analysis published on the website Motherboard, Mr Gardi concluded: “I believe that Hyperloop is merely a modern day version of the pneumatic tubes used in banks, stores, and industry to move money and small items over long distances or to other floors of a building.
“They’ve been around for over a century, though not so much these days. One reason I think Hyperloop is simpler than folks think is that Elon Musk has resurrected another technology from the depths of time, one that was a contender once, too - the electric car!”

Mr Musk’s intended location for the first Hyperloop is California, between Los Angeles and San Francisco. His motivation for the project came from disillusionment with the Golden State’s high speed rail project, which has been dubbed the “bullet train to nowhere” after a series of setbacks.

He believes the Hyperloop could be built for a tenth of the cost and deliver passengers between the two cities in just 30 minutes, compared to three hours for the bullet train.

The bullet train is currently estimated to be costing $68 billion and may not be completed until 2028. It would reach top speeds of only around 130mph. In a survey seven in 10 people said, if the train ever does run, they would “never or hardly ever” use it anyway.

In an internet conversation this week with Sir Richard Branson, Mr Musk said: “I originally started thinking about it when I read a thing about California’s high speed rail project, which was somewhat disappointing. It is actually worse than taking the plane. I get a little sad when things are not getting better in the future.

“Another example would be like the Concorde being retired and the fact there is no supersonic passenger transport. I think that is sad. You want the future to be better than the past, or at least I do.
“The Hyperloop is something that would go effectively faster than the speed of sound. Conceivably you could live in San Fran and work in LA.”
Mr Musk said the Hyperloop would be best used between paired cities less than 1,000 miles apart, and would be safer than air travel.

However, Mr Musk said last week that he is too busy with space to build it himself. He added: “I think I kind of shot myself in the foot by ever mentioning the Hyperloop, because I’m too strung out. Obviously I have to focus on core Tesla business, and SpaceX business, and that’s more than enough.”

Mr Gardi has confidence though. He said: “Building Hyperloop’s main line for a tenth the cost of high speed rail is not only feasible, it’s doable.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10235261/Inside-the-Hyperloop-the-pneumatic-travel-system-faster-than-the-speed-of-sound.html
Back to top
View user's profile 
MythopoeikaOffline
Boring petty conservative
Joined: 18 Sep 2001
Total posts: 9109
Location: Not far from Bedford
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 11-08-2013 10:20    Post subject: Reply with quote

This kind of thing has been tried before in earlier times and it failed.
With present-day technology though, there is the chance that it could work.

However...nobody's talked about how much it would cost to run.
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 14-08-2013 12:53    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hyperloop: flawed fantasy or achievable challenge
The Hyperloop, an ambitious new form of transport proposed by SpaceX and PayPal founder Elon Musk, could be possible but faces some flaws, according to those who have analysed his plans.
By Richard Gray, Science Correspondent
6:03AM BST 14 Aug 2013

The unveiling of the designs of Musk's "fifth mode of transport", which would fire passengers in pods at speeds of up to 760 miles per hour between cities, has generated a great deal of excitement.

Amateur engineers who had been speculating on what Musk had been intending when he first raised the prospect of the Hyperloop, were left tearing up their own plans.

What Musk proposes is certainly ambitious.
In a 57 page design brief, he set out his vision, with passengers paying around $20 (£13) to travel in capsules that will be propelled across distances of up to 900 miles in a series of tubes.

The tubes themselves would be elevated above street level, in which the capsules would float on a cushion of pressurised air expelled from tiny holes in skis attached to the bottom of the capsule.

A magnetic linear accelerator at various points along the tubs would accelerate the capsules, each containing 28 people.
For a Hyperloop link between Los Angels and San Francisco, Musk estimates the journey would take just half an hour and could transport 7.4 million people each way a year.
All this he promises for just $6 billion (£3.88 billion).

While it all sounds feasible, there are some potential pitfalls that stand in the way:

Heat damage
Compressing air and expelling it can produce heat, which could potentially damage the capsule and the surrounding tube.
Musk predicts cooling the air from temperatures of 283 degrees C after compression and that temperatures of around 125 degrees C will be created immediately beneath the skis.

Sam Jaffe, a senior research analyst at Navigant Research, said that pods would need to carry quite large coolant systems to counteract this.
This would increase their weight and reduce their efficiency.

He said: "The biggest concern with this plan has to do with temperature. The pod will be compressing air and expelling it downwards and backwards.
"All that air compression creates an enormous amount of heat, which can damage the pod and its machinery.
"Musk’s solution is to add to each pod a water tank that will capture that heat and turn it into steam to be collected at the next station.

"Although the thermodynamic calculations are correct, a small pod with only a few cubic feet of room for a heat exchanger leaves little space for an efficient exchange of heat.
"That means that the flow of water must be increased, requiring a lot more water on board. There may be an elegant solution for this challenge, but it’s not in Musk’s current paper."

Wind stress
Tall structures are prone to wind shear – just ask any sky-scrapper architect.
The differences in wind strength at the top of a building compared to the bottom can place large forces on them and cause them to sway, if not appropriately designed.

Musk proposes building the Hyperloop tube and its solar panels on top of pillars ranging from 20 feet to 100 feet.

In analysis for Navigant Research, Mr Jaffe said: "Wind stress is another challenge.
"Any structure elevated 100 feet off the ground is going to be under a lot of wind pressure, which will act on it in weird and sometimes multiple directions.

"If that structure is a heavy tube stretching hundreds of miles in either direction, you effectively have a big sail. Will the concrete pylons be powerful enough to resist that pressure?"

Land cost
The pylons themselves will not take up much land, but anyone attempting to turn Musk's vision into a reality will need to seek permission to build along a long thin 400 mile long strip of land.

As some have pointed out, the $6 billion cost of building the Hyperloop does not include the cost of buying land, which would surely see the project costs rocket.
Even if this was possible, getting planning permission to build such a construction is yet another hurdle.

This is not as simple as it seems. Look at the problems with building wind turbines and facing the route of the High Speed 2 Rail link in the UK.
Now imagine trying to do that with something that will be elevated above the landscape and visible for miles around.

Even if they were to build it along the route of an existing highway, then the traffic delays caused by the construction would be difficult to sell to commuters and politicians.

Energy supply
Musk proposes using solar panels mounted on top of the tubes to provide the energy required to power the Hyperloop.

John Hansman, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told the MIT Technology Review, that he had reservations about the energy it would require.
He said: "It would be enormously expensive."

“My questions aren’t could you do it, but could you do it in a way that makes sense from an energy efficiency standpoint and makes sense from an economic standpoint.”

He added that Musk's proposal to use Tesla electric vehicle batteries to suck air in through the front of the pod, compress it and force it out through skis on the bottom required a lot of energy.
He said it was unclear whether the batteries would hold enough energy to do this for the entire trip.

Practicality
To transport 7.4 million people a year, Musk predicts the Hyperloop would need to have one capsule departing once every minute for 12 hours a day every day.

However, he also raises the prospect of airport style security, which combined with the inevitable technical hitches that will create delays, could dramatically reduce the numbers that could travel.

Equally, there will be peak times, during the hours when commuters want to reach their place of work and return home, so there will be times when it will be more congested and others when it will be quiet.
So, the chances of carrying the maximum number of passengers Musk is aiming for diminishes.

With the High Speed Rail link between San Francisco and Los Angeles that so riled Musk into dreaming up the Hyperloop in the first place predicted to carry at least 16.5 million, then the Hyperloop is unlikely to fulfil the area's transport needs.

However, if Musk's estimate for a cost of $6 billion is correct, compared to the $68 billion for the high speed rail project, then he could build several Hyperloops to meet the demand.

G-forces
Provided the capsules are accelerated slowly, then the forces exerted on humans inside the capsules should actually be fairly low. No more than that of a sports car, according to Musk.

However, the tubes would need to be as flat as possible and without any steep corners to ensure those forces stay low.

If the capsule banks with the corners then any additional g-force will be applied vertically down through the capsule, making the ride more comfortable.

Musk's other commitments

Elon Musk himself has admitted that he is already over stretched with running his two companies – SpaceX and Tesla. He is also on the board for a solar installation company called Solar City.

With five children at home, he has said he is not able to dedicate the time that would be needed to see a Hyperloop realised.
Instead he has said he may attempt to build a small-scale prototype but will rely on others to take the idea through to fruition.

Sadly, as Jay Yarow of Business Insider points out, a project of this scale needs someone of Musk's vision, influence and wealth to make a reality.
Mr Yarow said: "Sadly, his 57-page plan for the Hyperloop is missing the key element for its success: Elon Musk." Cool

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10240535/The-Hyperloop-flawed-fantasy-or-achievable-challenge.html
Back to top
View user's profile 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fortean Times Message Board Forum Index -> Mainstream News Stories All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 30, 31, 32, 33  Next
Page 31 of 33

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group