Forums

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages 
The March of Technology
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 31, 32, 33  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fortean Times Message Board Forum Index -> Mainstream News Stories
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 15-08-2013 21:07    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having worked (briefly) in satellite communications in the 60s, I find myself gob-smacked by the rate of progress today. Back then, it seemed a bit of a novelty, but now it has embedded itself in our culture and our industry. If we somehow lost access to space now, the world would fragment again into rarely communicating groups, and so much we take for granted now would be lost.

Alphasat: 'Space A380' switches on 'brain'
Engineers begin testing the communications payload on the Alphasat spacecraft.
By Jonathan Amos, Science correspondent, BBC News

Europe's biggest ever telecommunications satellite has switched on its innovative British payload to begin a month of testing.
Seven-metre-long Alphasat - dubbed the "A380 of space" - was launched at the end of July, and is gradually being commissioned prior to entering service.
The latest step was to activate its digital signal processor - the unit that will handle all the telecoms traffic passing through the platform.

Alphasat is owned by Inmarsat PLC.
The London-based company, which provides communications links for people and organisations on the move, developed the new satellite in partnership with the European and French space agencies.
Alphasat will be used by broadcasters such as the BBC, shipping operators, the oil industry, the military, and anyone else working away from traditional terrestrial communications networks.

The spacecraft brings significant extra capability and capacity to Inmarsat's services, thanks in part to the digital processor that was developed at Astrium UK in Portsmouth.
The unit can switch bandwidth and power on to specific locations on the ground at very short notice, to meet the demand when and where it is most needed.
It will ensure Inmarsat's L-band radio-frequency allocation is used in the most efficient way possible.

"We are at the beginning of a nearly four-week test campaign for the payload," explained Franco Carnevale, Inmarsat's vice president for satellite and launch vehicles.
"As of [Wednesday], the payload has been switched on, part of the new and sophisticated on-board payload calibration system is up and running, the high-speed link to the advanced digital processor to set up and tear down connectivity is working and a signal has successfully been put through the forward payload - which is excellent news."

The fascinating picture at the top of this page shows Alphasat in orbit.
It was taken by Astrium engineer and amateur astronomer Richard Hopkins on Monday.
It places the spacecraft in the geostationary arc at about 8 degrees East, some 36,000km above the equator.
"The brightest star in the image in the middle is Kappa Aquilae, magnitude 5.9 and the limit of naked-eye visibility from a very dark location," explained Mr Hopkins.
"You can see the stars drifting in the image due to Earth's rotation, but the geostationary satellites are fixed.

"The first Meteosat Second Generation satellite (launched in 2005) is also in the frame, but as it's only 3m across it's too faint to see. The Intelsat satellite is probably of comparable brightness to Pluto," he told BBC News.
"The image was taken from Guildford, and used approximately a two-minute exposure at 200mm focal length. The field of view is about 5 degrees."


Alphasat is only at 8 degrees East temporarily. Engineers plan to move it eventually to an orbital spot at 25 degrees East. From that location, it will provide coverage to Europe, the Middle East and Africa, gradually taking over the services currently delivered by a previous generation satellite, Inmarsat-4 F3.

In addition to its commercial role, Alphasat will demonstrate a number of technologies for the European Space Agency (Esa).
The most noteworthy of these is a laser-based communications system that will underpin Europe's forthcoming orbital data relay system.
This has been developed by German researchers to permit gigabit connections between Earth observation satellites and the ground.
Alphasat will validate the laser terminal by downlinking pictures from the EU's Sentinel-1a radar spacecraft when it launches next year.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23714597
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 19-08-2013 23:10    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not a great fan of the Hairy Bikers, but this steam-punk documentary is quite interesting. It's a look at the nuts and bolts (and rivets) of the industrial revolution. I hadn't realised before how steam traction engines handled ploughing, and the section about the box-boat canal barges (forerunners of container ships) was also new to me.

The part on caulking and tarring canal barges also showed some stuff that was new to me, although similar techniques were used on sea-going vessels.


The Hairy Bikers' Restoration Road Trip - Episode 2

The Hairy Bikers continue their journey around Britain, meeting passionate, skilled heritage volunteers and taking part in the most exciting restoration projects of our industrial past.

It is full steam ahead in Wiltshire as they help rebuild an early traction engine before seeing how they revolutionised farming, in Derbyshire they tackle a hundred-year-old cotton spinning mule that has laid dormant for decades and attempt to weave their own Hairy Biker cloth and in Cheshire they restore a rare barge once used to transport coal on Britain's canals.

Available until
9:59PM Sun, 1 Sep 2013
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 20-08-2013 23:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b038rj1b/Dreaming_the_Impossible_Unbuilt_Britain_Making_Connections/

Dreaming the Impossible: Unbuilt Britain - 2. Making Connections

Using her skills to uncover long-forgotten and abandoned plans, architectural investigator Dr Olivia Horsfall Turner explores the fascinating and dramatic stories behind some of the grandest designs that were never built. In this episode she looks at two of the most radical civil engineering projects proposed in the last century and explores how international politics and vested interests both drove, and derailed, plans to better connect Britain to the continent.

In the early 1900s Britain was anticipating the threat of war. As concern grew about Germany expanding its naval fleet and investing in its infrastructure, there were calls to find a way for Britain's navy to be able to react swiftly to protect our waters. The solution proposed was to create a ship canal big enough for warships to cross from the Firth of Clyde on the west of Scotland to the Firth of Forth on the east. This enormous civil engineering endeavour would have completely changed the central belt of Scotland - the favoured route was through Loch Lomond, now considered one of the most treasured wilderness areas in the country.

There was huge support for the building of the canal, not least from members of parliament who recognised the potential for creating jobs and wealth in their constituencies. The debate over whether to invest £50m of the public purse in building the canal dragged on for years in both the House of Commons and Lords, with opinion split on whether it really was a strategic imperative. In the end, technology decided the fate of the canal. By 1918, all of the naval fleet was fuelled by oil rather than coal and so instead of a canal an oil pipeline was built from the mouth of the Clyde to Grangemouth on the east, and royal navy destroyers never did - and never will - sail up Loch Lomond.

Fifty years later, instead of seeking to protect Britain from attacks from the continent, thoughts had turned to how to connect our island to the rest of Europe. There had been talk of building a channel tunnel between England and France for centuries. In contrast with the Mid-Scotland Canal, where strategic advantages stimulated building, it was national security concerns that cut short the first proposal for a Channel Tunnel. The idea was presented to the British by Napoleon in 1802, but was rejected over concerns that the French had covert plans to invade England.

But 170 years later, the idea was to become a reality. Britain had finally joined mainland Europe through her membership of the Common Market in 1973, and both the French and British governments agreed it made sense build a tunnel together. But in 1975, construction was again abandoned because the British prime minister, Harold Wilson, had to look for economies in a financial crisis caused by dramatically rising world oil prices. Once more, the bid to connect with the continent had failed.

The idea was resurrected yet again in the early 1980s, with several competing schemes for consideration. The boldest of these, sponsored by British Steel, was a vast structure combing a double-decker bridge and tunnel, linked to an artificial island in the middle of the English Channel. The materials for the construction of this vast project would keep the steel mills of England and Scotland busy for a decade - but the politicians chose in favour of the Eurotunnel bid and British industry lost out.

Both these grandiose schemes defined how Britain saw its relationship with Europe. In an age when the headline 'Fog in Channel - Europe Isolated' made sense, a naval ship canal that would protect our island fortress from continental rivals was considered to be in the national interest. But just 60 years later, the fog had lifted and securing Britain's national interests became dependent on a physical connection with countries previously regarded as hostile. However, both plans foundered on the conflict of politics and vested interest.

Available until
9:59PM Mon, 2 Sep 2013


Last edited by rynner2 on 31-08-2013 09:44; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 21-08-2013 09:44    Post subject: Reply with quote

A commentary on Elon Musk's Hyperloop, and a look at predecessor technologies, back to Brunel and before:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/10253847/Elon-Musks-Hyperloop-return-to-the-shock-of-the-pneu.html

A long article, so I wasn't going to paste it in full - but I can't anyway, because this is one of those Telegraph articles that refuses to be copied!


Last edited by rynner2 on 31-08-2013 09:43; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 26-08-2013 22:31    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's hi-tech and there's high teddy-tech:

Giant leap for Pi-powered teddy bear

A soft toy controlled by a Raspberry Pi computer has re-created Felix Baumgartner's record-breaking skydive.
Mr Baumgartner made the highest ever freefall in October 2012 when he jumped from a balloon about 39km up.
A bear called Babbage has now leapt from a similar height after ascending beneath a hydrogen-filled balloon. Cool

The Raspberry Pi low-cost micro-computer inside Babbage transmitted his position and shot stills and video throughout the flight and descent.
The robot Babbage was created by high altitude ballooning enthusiast Dave Akerman, who has used the Pi as the control centre on other flights.

Babbage the bear is the official mascot of the Raspberry Pi project. The bare-bones computer was created to serve as an introduction to computers for children, but it has become a favourite among hobbyists who use it to control their home-brewed tech projects.

The Babbage flight is one of the more ambitious projects centred on the Pi and shows what the low cost computer can do.

The launch site was a field near Mr Akerman's home north of Newbury, Berkshire.
Take off was at 12:25 GMT on 26 August. Babbage drifted south west during his flight and rose to a height of just over 39km - slightly higher than Mr Baumgartner's record of 38,969m.

Mr Akerman made a cradle that Babbage sat on during the flight that was equipped with another camera that shot images similar to those taken over the shoulder of Mr Baumgartner before he jumped.

The Raspberry Pi inside the bear and his cradle switched from stills to video to record the moment when the toy fell off the cradle and started its descent.

On the Babbage flight, the Pi inside the bear's body logged altitude, shot footage and transmitted it back to the ground. It also constantly broadcast the craft's location so the flight could be mapped and the pioneering toy retrieved. Many people followed the flight online via the streaming video feed sent back by Babbage.

Mr Akerman said the whole flight had gone "brilliantly".
"It released on time at just above 39km," he told the BBC, adding that a firing mechanism on the balloon was set to [be] triggered just above that altitude. "Now," he said, "we just need to get all the bits back."

Babbage landed around 16:00 GMT in a field a couple of few miles south of Shaftesbury. During his descent, Babbage was pursued by Mr Akerman and helpers in a chase car add was found around 17:26 GMT.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23840596 Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 31-08-2013 09:41    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sky in ultra high-defintion TV first
Stoke City v West Ham will this afternoon become the first ever British football match to be broadcast live in ultra high defnition. Matt Warman reports.
By Matt Warman , Head of Technology
7:00AM BST 31 Aug 2013

Britain’s first live ultra high-defintion broadcast will take place this afternoon – and as Sky beams Stoke City v West Ham to a select audience at its London HQ, retailers, football fans and TV buffs will be holding their breath. Is this the TV revolution that will succeed where 3D has failed? Is this the moment when, finally, it’s decisively found that watching a match on TV really is better than going to the event itself?

The BBC trialled so-called ultra high-definition TV during the Olympics. Using a private high speed broadband network it sent extraordinary pictures to a small number of sites including Broadcasting House, beaming images that are four times as good as the current best high definition images. But the Sky trial is the first to use satellites that are also available for commercial purposes to send images around the country – and while there are no specific plans to launch a commercial service at a specific date, Japanese broadcasters have already announced that they will transmit the World Cup final live from Brazil in ultra-high defintion. Sky won’t want to be behind.

Barney Francis, the managaing director of Sky Sports, is cautious about the technology’s potential, but ultimately in favour. “We keep a close eye on emerging technologies here at Sky,” he claims. “At the company that led the UK into digital, HD, mobile and 3D TV, we want to keep bringing our customers the innovations that improve the experience of watching TV. That’s why, back in October last year we first experimented with Ultra HD – or 4k, as some people call it.”

He says that initial trials carried out in the autumn used primitive, handheld cameras, but laid the ground work for today’s landmark. “Back then, we had just a couple of handheld Ultra HD cameras at a wet and windy Emirates Stadium for Arsenal’s UEFA Champions League tie with Olympiakos”, he says.

“At Upton Park today we will take our UHD research to a new level, becoming the first UK broadcaster to successfully complete a live broadcast. Unlike our early efforts at Arsenal, this is a fully-fledged live production, with multiple cameras and a full outside broadcast. We’ll see enough in this test event to confirm that live sport in UHD has real potential.”

Any detail of a launch for these pictures, however, are to be confirmed: “As and when affordable UHD TVs are available, over the next few years, our early leadership will position us well”, says Francis.

Sky is testing its ultra-high-definition coverage on four Sony televisions each costing £25,000 – pictures this pretty don’t yet come cheap. But already smaller sets, at around 55”, are available for £4,000, and costs will fall rapidly. But just as many viewers felt high definition was an unnecessary improvement, today’s UHD will be the industry standard in a few years time.

So what do these pictures look like? In short, ultra-high definition is so vivid it’s almost unreal. Best viewed on big screens, it offers more detail than your eyes can see, and shows more than they would see if you were at a real sporting event. If HD showed every blade of grass, UHD shows every ligule and leafbud. That means it takes some getting used to, but once you’ve lived with UHD, there’s no going back.

But there will be plenty of bumps along that road – few users will spend the money on TVs this good unless there is content to justify the purchase, yet few broadcasters will spend money on the programming until there is a good number of TVs already out there.

It’s a catch-22, but it’s one that is mitigated by the fact that many Hollywood films are already being made in the new standard anyway. Getting the new pictures to TV sets, however, remains a challenge: standard spectrum used for regular TV is too full, and the UK’s broadband network is simply not yet good enough for it to be sent over the web. That leaves satellite networks such as Sky’s effectively the only option for now.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10277864/Sky-in-ultra-high-defintion-TV-first.html
Back to top
View user's profile 
CarlosTheDJOffline
Dazed and confused for so long its not true
Great Old One
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Total posts: 1927
Location: Sussex
Age: 37
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 31-08-2013 13:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

It sounds awesome, but...

Quote:
...it offers more detail than your eyes can see...


How can you tell? HOW? Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile 
Ronson8Offline
Things can only get better.
Great Old One
Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Total posts: 6061
Location: MK
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 31-08-2013 14:02    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do we really need such high definition that we can see the stitching on the ball in a football match? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile 
Pietro_Mercurios
Heuristically Challenged
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 02-09-2013 10:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

First part of longer article about the accelerating march of technological progress in computing.
Quote:
http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/05/robots-artificial-intelligence-jobs-automation

Welcome, Robot Overlords. Please Don't Fire Us?

Smart machines probably won't kill us all—but they'll definitely take our jobs, and sooner than you think.

Mother Jones. By Kevin Drum. May/June 2013


This is a story about the future. Not the unhappy future, the one where climate change turns the planet into a cinder or we all die in a global nuclear war. This is the happy version. It's the one where computers keep getting smarter and smarter, and clever engineers keep building better and better robots. By 2040, computers the size of a softball are as smart as human beings. Smarter, in fact. Plus they're computers: They never get tired, they're never ill-tempered, they never make mistakes, and they have instant access to all of human knowledge.

The result is paradise. Global warming is a problem of the past because computers have figured out how to generate limitless amounts of green energy and intelligent robots have tirelessly built the infrastructure to deliver it to our homes. No one needs to work anymore. Robots can do everything humans can do, and they do it uncomplainingly, 24 hours a day. Some things remain scarce—beachfront property in Malibu, original Rembrandts—but thanks to super-efficient use of natural resources and massive recycling, scarcity of ordinary consumer goods is a thing of the past. Our days are spent however we please, perhaps in study, perhaps playing video games. It's up to us.

Maybe you think I'm pulling your leg here. Or being archly ironic. After all, this does have a bit of a rose-colored tint to it, doesn't it? Like something from The Jetsons or the cover of Wired. That would hardly be a surprising reaction. Computer scientists have been predicting the imminent rise of machine intelligence since at least 1956, when the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence gave the field its name, and there are only so many times you can cry wolf. Today, a full seven decades after the birth of the computer, all we have are iPhones, Microsoft Word, and in-dash navigation. You could be excused for thinking that computers that truly match the human brain are a ridiculous pipe dream.

But they're not. It's true that we've made far slower progress toward real artificial intelligence than we once thought, but that's for a very simple and very human reason: Early computer scientists grossly underestimated the power of the human brain and the difficulty of emulating one. It turns out that this is a very, very hard problem, sort of like filling up Lake Michigan one drop at a time. In fact, not just sort of like. It's exactly like filling up Lake Michigan one drop at a time. If you want to understand the future of computing, it's essential to understand this.

Suppose it's 1940 and Lake Michigan has (somehow) been emptied. Your job is to fill it up using the following rule: To start off, you can add one fluid ounce of water to the lake bed. Eighteen months later, you can add two. In another 18 months, you can add four ounces. And so on. Obviously this is going to take a while.

By 1950, you have added around a gallon of water. But you keep soldiering on. By 1960, you have a bit more than 150 gallons. By 1970, you have 16,000 gallons, about as much as an average suburban swimming pool.

At this point it's been 30 years, and even though 16,000 gallons is a fair amount of water, it's nothing compared to the size of Lake Michigan. To the naked eye you've made no progress at all.

So let's skip all the way ahead to 2000. Still nothing. You have—maybe—a slight sheen on the lake floor. How about 2010? You have a few inches of water here and there. This is ridiculous. It's now been 70 years and you still don't have enough water to float a goldfish. Surely this task is futile?

But wait. Just as you're about to give up, things suddenly change. By 2020, you have about 40 feet of water. And by 2025 you're done. After 70 years you had nothing. Fifteen years later, the job was finished.

Animated Graphic illustrating 'Moore's Law'

IF YOU HAVE ANY KIND OF BACKGROUND in computers, you've already figured out that I didn't pick these numbers out of a hat. I started in 1940 because that's about when the first programmable computer was invented. I chose a doubling time of 18 months because of a cornerstone of computer history called Moore's Law, which famously estimates that computing power doubles approximately every 18 months. And I chose Lake Michigan because its size, in fluid ounces, is roughly the same as the computing power of the human brain measured in calculations per second.

In other words, just as it took us until 2025 to fill up Lake Michigan, the simple exponential curve of Moore's Law suggests it's going to take us until 2025 to build a computer with the processing power of the human brain. And it's going to happen the same way: For the first 70 years, it will seem as if nothing is happening, even though we're doubling our progress every 18 months. Then, in the final 15 years, seemingly out of nowhere, we'll finish the job.

...

More at link.
Back to top
View user's profile 
KondoruOffline
Unfeathered Biped
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Total posts: 5788
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 02-09-2013 17:53    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its Dads 11 plus question

There is a lilly on a pond, each day it doubles in size.
On the 30th day it covers the pond.

On what day does it cover HALF the pond?

(Its amazing how many get that wrong. Its a `read the question` question.)
Back to top
View user's profile 
Ronson8Offline
Things can only get better.
Great Old One
Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Total posts: 6061
Location: MK
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 02-09-2013 18:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saturday!
Back to top
View user's profile 
KondoruOffline
Unfeathered Biped
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Total posts: 5788
Gender: Unknown
PostPosted: 02-09-2013 18:58    Post subject: Reply with quote

<facepalm>

why Saturday?
Back to top
View user's profile 
rynner2Offline
What a Cad!
Great Old One
Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Total posts: 21365
Location: Under the moon
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 02-09-2013 21:49    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kondoru wrote:
<facepalm>

why Saturday?

Why not?!

It's got a 1 in 7 chance of being right! Wink

Still, I'm glad some people on this MB have some understanding of exponentials. They're also at the root of Malthusian warnings about overpopulation, and my idea for simpler tax systems!
Back to top
View user's profile 
CarlosTheDJOffline
Dazed and confused for so long its not true
Great Old One
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Total posts: 1927
Location: Sussex
Age: 37
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 02-09-2013 22:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pietro_Mercurios wrote:
First part of longer article about the accelerating march of technological progress in computing.
Quote:
http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/05/robots-artificial-intelligence-jobs-automation

Welcome, Robot Overlords. Please Don't Fire Us?

Smart machines probably won't kill us all—but they'll definitely take our jobs, and sooner than you think.

Mother Jones. By Kevin Drum. May/June 2013


This is a story about the future. Not the unhappy future, the one where climate change turns the planet into a cinder or we all die in a global nuclear war. This is the happy version. It's the one where computers keep getting smarter and smarter, and clever engineers keep building better and better robots. By 2040, computers the size of a softball are as smart as human beings. Smarter, in fact. Plus they're computers: They never get tired, they're never ill-tempered, they never make mistakes, and they have instant access to all of human knowledge.

The result is paradise. Global warming is a problem of the past because computers have figured out how to generate limitless amounts of green energy and intelligent robots have tirelessly built the infrastructure to deliver it to our homes. No one needs to work anymore. Robots can do everything humans can do, and they do it uncomplainingly, 24 hours a day. Some things remain scarce—beachfront property in Malibu, original Rembrandts—but thanks to super-efficient use of natural resources and massive recycling, scarcity of ordinary consumer goods is a thing of the past. Our days are spent however we please, perhaps in study, perhaps playing video games. It's up to us.

Maybe you think I'm pulling your leg here. Or being archly ironic. After all, this does have a bit of a rose-colored tint to it, doesn't it? Like something from The Jetsons or the cover of Wired. That would hardly be a surprising reaction. Computer scientists have been predicting the imminent rise of machine intelligence since at least 1956, when the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence gave the field its name, and there are only so many times you can cry wolf. Today, a full seven decades after the birth of the computer, all we have are iPhones, Microsoft Word, and in-dash navigation. You could be excused for thinking that computers that truly match the human brain are a ridiculous pipe dream.

But they're not. It's true that we've made far slower progress toward real artificial intelligence than we once thought, but that's for a very simple and very human reason: Early computer scientists grossly underestimated the power of the human brain and the difficulty of emulating one. It turns out that this is a very, very hard problem, sort of like filling up Lake Michigan one drop at a time. In fact, not just sort of like. It's exactly like filling up Lake Michigan one drop at a time. If you want to understand the future of computing, it's essential to understand this.

Suppose it's 1940 and Lake Michigan has (somehow) been emptied. Your job is to fill it up using the following rule: To start off, you can add one fluid ounce of water to the lake bed. Eighteen months later, you can add two. In another 18 months, you can add four ounces. And so on. Obviously this is going to take a while.

By 1950, you have added around a gallon of water. But you keep soldiering on. By 1960, you have a bit more than 150 gallons. By 1970, you have 16,000 gallons, about as much as an average suburban swimming pool.

At this point it's been 30 years, and even though 16,000 gallons is a fair amount of water, it's nothing compared to the size of Lake Michigan. To the naked eye you've made no progress at all.

So let's skip all the way ahead to 2000. Still nothing. You have—maybe—a slight sheen on the lake floor. How about 2010? You have a few inches of water here and there. This is ridiculous. It's now been 70 years and you still don't have enough water to float a goldfish. Surely this task is futile?

But wait. Just as you're about to give up, things suddenly change. By 2020, you have about 40 feet of water. And by 2025 you're done. After 70 years you had nothing. Fifteen years later, the job was finished.

Animated Graphic illustrating 'Moore's Law'

IF YOU HAVE ANY KIND OF BACKGROUND in computers, you've already figured out that I didn't pick these numbers out of a hat. I started in 1940 because that's about when the first programmable computer was invented. I chose a doubling time of 18 months because of a cornerstone of computer history called Moore's Law, which famously estimates that computing power doubles approximately every 18 months. And I chose Lake Michigan because its size, in fluid ounces, is roughly the same as the computing power of the human brain measured in calculations per second.

In other words, just as it took us until 2025 to fill up Lake Michigan, the simple exponential curve of Moore's Law suggests it's going to take us until 2025 to build a computer with the processing power of the human brain. And it's going to happen the same way: For the first 70 years, it will seem as if nothing is happening, even though we're doubling our progress every 18 months. Then, in the final 15 years, seemingly out of nowhere, we'll finish the job.

...

More at link.


I'd actually never thought about Moore's law to that degree before. All I can say is.........wow.
Back to top
View user's profile 
Ronson8Offline
Things can only get better.
Great Old One
Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Total posts: 6061
Location: MK
Gender: Male
PostPosted: 02-09-2013 22:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kondoru wrote:
<facepalm>

why Saturday?
Because the pond was half covered on Friday, simples. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Fortean Times Message Board Forum Index -> Mainstream News Stories All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 31, 32, 33  Next
Page 32 of 33

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group