| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
| Guest |
 Posted: 02-10-2009 19:08 Post subject: Al Qaida is US asset |
 |
|
|
| Al Qaida (or most other terrrorist group) exists where US intelligence dominates. Al Qaida in US when Bush needs excuse to activate Mid-east war. That was 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there was no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appear to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. That's why you see Al Qaida attacks in US, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Iraq (after it is occupied by US). Because where they are protected by the intelligence, worked as a whip to beat people. When government want money and power, they beat the people with this whip (Al Qaida terror attack) People feel hurt then give up their civil rights and money to the government. DOJ got the Patriot Act. Pentagon got fat budget and Mid-east war. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stuneville Administrator
Joined: 09 Mar 2002 Total posts: 10190 Location: FTMB HQ Age: 46 Gender: Male |
| Posted: 03-10-2009 14:35 Post subject: |
|
|
|
| You're back, then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| barfing_pumpkin A pumpkin that pukes. Yes. I am.
Great Old One Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Total posts: 885 Location: Hampshire Age: 41 Gender: Male |
| Posted: 03-10-2009 20:08 Post subject: |
|
|
|
Bloody Hell - I thought you were banned, Kathaksung. What happened, did feds relent?
(It's actually quite nice to have Kathak back, really - his mind really is a Fortean thing unto itself, and quite fascinating when observed in action.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Spookdaddy Cuckoo Joined: 24 May 2006 Total posts: 3834 Location: Midwich Gender: Unknown |
| Posted: 03-10-2009 20:34 Post subject: |
|
|
|
| barfing_pumpkin wrote: | | Bloody Hell - I thought you were banned, Kathaksung. What happened, did feds relent?... |
Obviously, kathaksung is a Dennis Publishing asset used to beat the people when they want money and power.
Ever noticed how kathaksung's posts on the FTMB only appear under the name...(looks left - looks right)...kathaksung on the FTMB when you read posts purportedly sent by...(checks under table)...kathaksung on the FTMB? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| stuneville Administrator
Joined: 09 Mar 2002 Total posts: 10190 Location: FTMB HQ Age: 46 Gender: Male |
| Posted: 03-10-2009 20:57 Post subject: |
|
|
|
| barfing_pumpkin wrote: | | Bloody Hell - I thought you were banned, Kathaksung. What happened, did feds relent? |
Nope: warned, but never banned.
We don't relent  . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ramonmercado Psycho Punk
Joined: 19 Aug 2003 Total posts: 17657 Location: Dublin Gender: Male |
| Posted: 04-10-2009 15:52 Post subject: |
|
|
|
| This is obviously a False Flag Op funded from the Mods discretionary account. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Dr_Baltar |
| Posted: 05-10-2009 11:31 Post subject: Re: Al Qaida is US asset |
|
|
|
| kathaksung1 wrote: | | Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appear to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. |
Call me old-fashioned, but I believe it's traditional to attack where you believe it will hurt your enemy most. Silly, I know, but it appears to be how these things work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Analis Great Old One Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Total posts: 838 Gender: Unknown |
| Posted: 07-10-2009 22:39 Post subject: Re: Al Qaida is US asset |
|
|
|
| Dr_Baltar wrote: | | kathaksung1 wrote: | | Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appear to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. |
Call me old-fashioned, but I believe it's traditional to attack where you believe it will hurt your enemy most. Silly, I know, but it appears to be how these things work. |
Syria is a long-time deadly ennemy of jihadists. Iran is supposed to be another deadly ennemy of Al Qaeda. So Al Qaeda should be very active in Syria and Iran. But they're not. Their absence seems not connected with the absence of their ennemies, but well correlated with the absence of US influence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| James_H2 Great Old One Joined: 26 Mar 2009 Total posts: 709 Location: Hackney! Gender: Male |
| Posted: 08-10-2009 10:13 Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I don't find the idea of, say, the CIA inventing an 'insurgent enemy' out of the whole cloth to be impossible at all, haven't they funded 'revolutions' before? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ramonmercado Psycho Punk
Joined: 19 Aug 2003 Total posts: 17657 Location: Dublin Gender: Male |
| Posted: 08-10-2009 10:18 Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think Al Qaeda is more a case of spectacular backfire. The US trained many of its leading cadres for other tasks and now they are turning on them.
The CIA etc never learn. Now they are backing Islamists in Baluchiustan in Iran who make the current Iranian Regime look like liberals. These fundies specialise in beheading their captives. Won't be long efore they turn on their handlers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Dr_Baltar |
| Posted: 08-10-2009 11:39 Post subject: Re: Al Qaida is US asset |
|
|
|
| Analis wrote: |
Syria is a long-time deadly ennemy of jihadists. Iran is supposed to be another deadly ennemy of Al Qaeda. So Al Qaeda should be very active in Syria and Iran. But they're not. Their absence seems not connected with the absence of their ennemies, but well correlated with the absence of US influence. |
You're kidding right? Islamic Jihad and Hamas are pretty much based in Syria. Iran funds and arms these two groups, along with Hezbollah. Their absence is only correlated with the absence of US influence if that's how you choose to see it. Far more likely is the scenario that they currently choose not to launch attacks in countries that fund Palestinian freedom fighters/terrorists and that would gladly see Israel obliterated. My enemy's enemy and all that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Analis Great Old One Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Total posts: 838 Gender: Unknown |
| Posted: 08-10-2009 13:39 Post subject: Re: Al Qaida is US asset |
|
|
|
| Dr_Baltar wrote: |
You're kidding right? Islamic Jihad and Hamas are pretty much based in Syria. Iran funds and arms these two groups, along with Hezbollah. Their absence is only correlated with the absence of US influence if that's how you choose to see it. Far more likely is the scenario that they currently choose not to launch attacks in countries that fund Palestinian freedom fighters/terrorists and that would gladly see Israel obliterated. My enemy's enemy and all that. |
I agree, their absence is only linked with absence of US influence. Except in Israelian and western propaganda, Islamic Jihad and Hamas have no ties to Al Qaida. Like the Hezbollah. Not only that, but all three see Al Qaida as an adversary. Some leaders and executives of Hamas and Islamic Jihad have accused OBL of being an agent of the CIA and the Zionist propaganda. Those groups are not interested in a world jihad against the western world ; they rely on religion to ascertain their identity, but they are Palestinian and Lebanese nationalist groups.
The syrian government relies on my ennemy's ennemy is my friend, but as for what they really thought of islamic fundamentalism, remember Hama in February 1982 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hama#Modern_era ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| misterwibble Great Old One Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Total posts: 355 Location: Nearby Age: 21 Gender: Female |
| Posted: 08-10-2009 13:41 Post subject: |
|
|
|
| There's also the minor point that neither regime are noted for their tenderness and compassion towards any form of dissent or opposition. You'd have to be extremely bravefoolish or both to even think of starting trouble in either country, they're both effectively police states with closely monitored and controlled populations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Dr_Baltar |
| Posted: 08-10-2009 14:09 Post subject: Re: Al Qaida is US asset |
|
|
|
| Analis wrote: |
I agree, their absence is only linked with absence of US influence. Except in Israelian and western propaganda, Islamic Jihad and Hamas have no ties to Al Qaida. Like the Hezbollah. Not only that, but all three see Al Qaida as an adversary. Some leaders and executives of Hamas and Islamic Jihad have accused OBL of being an agent of the CIA and the Zionist propaganda. Those groups are not interested in a world jihad against the western world ; they rely on religion to ascertain their identity, but they are Palestinian and Lebanese nationalist groups.
The syrian government relies on my ennemy's ennemy is my friend, but as for what they really thought of islamic fundamentalism, remember Hama in February 1982 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hama#Modern_era ). |
The Hama massacre was essentially a clash between Sunni and Shiah factions, rather than a crackdown on Islamic fundamentalism.
I agree that Hezbollah, Hamas and IJ have somewhat different aims to Al Qaeda, but I've seen no evidence that makes the case for AQ being controlled by the CIA, other than vague paranoid hearsay and anonymous accusations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Analis Great Old One Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Total posts: 838 Gender: Unknown |
| Posted: 08-10-2009 22:36 Post subject: Re: Al Qaida is US asset |
|
|
|
| Dr_Baltar wrote: |
The Hama massacre was essentially a clash between Sunni and Shiah factions, rather than a crackdown on Islamic fundamentalism.
|
Not really. This was a ideological war. The syrian government was held mostly by Alawits (a faction of Shiahs), but it was secular. Former president Hafez al-Hassad was widely seen as a non-believer. He made references to Islam, but it was probably for political reasons. He never advocated any war of religion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
