| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
songhrati Yeti Joined: 03 Oct 2003 Total posts: 71 Gender: Male |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Anome_ Faceless Man
Great Old One Joined: 23 May 2002 Total posts: 5377 Location: Left, and to the back. Age: 45 Gender: Male |
 Posted: 12-10-2013 05:38 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Not this again. Bob Hawke's been pushing it for years. The fact is it's a bad idea.
And inefficient. We could avoid a lot of the risk by just not mining the Uranium in the NT to start with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Mythopoeika Boring petty conservative
Joined: 18 Sep 2001 Total posts: 9109 Location: Not far from Bedford Gender: Unknown |
| Posted: 12-10-2013 08:57 Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why is it a bad idea? It'd be miles from anywhere in a huge country that is mostly empty of people.
If the Uranium is in the ground, it's going to be mined, whatever people say to stop it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
