It’s hard to overstate the impact of John Carpenter’s 1982
movie The Thing, with its evocative and creepy Antarctic setting, its
disturbingly minimal Morricone score, its slow-burning ramping up of paranoia
and claustrophobia and, of course, its envelope-busting special effects that
did things to dogs and humans you’d never thought possible.
Impossible too, I suppose, to recapture the kind of
excitement the film generated among its original audiences (I went to see it
twice the week it came out, so gobsmacked was I). Hollywood seems perpetually
desperate to pull off such a feat in its frenzy of remaking, rebooting and
recycling, but the end results rarely recapture the spirit of the originals so
much as simply reshuffle their DNA into some awful, shambling parody of a
proper movie, an ersatz abomination far easier to spot than the horrifying
shape-shifter of Carpenter’s classic film.
The makers of this latest ‘re-imagining’ (as such things
are laughingly called) know full-well the huge affection in which The Thing is held, and have tried (JJ Abrams-like) to dodge the ire of geeks by ‘respecting’
Carpenter’s film and opting for a prequel rather than a remake.
Sounds like a smart move, until you realise some of the
problems you’ve just set yourself. It was the Norwegians who got to the alien
spaceship first and unleashed its long-slumbering inhabitant (just like they
got to the South Pole first, so it jolly well serves them right). So, problem
number one is that anyone who has seen Carpenter’s The Thing knows
exactly what is going to happen, just not precisely how (this
qualifies as fanboy fun, though, as we oldsters can enjoy seeing just how
cleverly the prequel sets up the film we know and love and catalogue each
continuity hit or miss with obsessive glee).
The second problem, of course, is that you’ve just saddled
yourselves with a film in which all the characters are Norwegian; this might
play well in certain parts of Minnesota but is a headache, really, as no-one in
Hollywood cares about Norwegians very much.
This one was quickly solved by our clever film-makers,
using that tried-and-tested Hollywood solution: parachute in some proper
Americans to sort everything out. Easy.
Except it isn’t, and, as a result, the film goes off the
boil within five minutes. Part of the genius of Carpenter’s original is its
utter commitment to the dramatic unities: the action unfolds over a short space
of time in one setting and has no distracting subplots. Its icy, paranoid grip
is not for one moment relaxed. Its world, for the duration of the film, is the world, and we are as trapped in it as the rapidly diminishing cast of
characters.
This time around, after a sort of scene-setting prologue
in which some Norwegians (speaking pesky Norwegian, necessitating subtitles)
run into big trouble in their little tractor, we are whisked off to nice,
normal America where an implausibly young and pretty girl palaeontologist (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) is
implausibly offered the chance to be in on the find of the century by a
mysterious Norwegian and his equally implausibly good-looking American research
assistant, who looks like he’s stepped out of a knitwear catalogue (useful,
really, as we know where he’s going). Thus, the spell is broken; the mere
glimpse of a busy outside world, easily and quickly reached by plane, is enough
to ensure that when we do return to the icy Antarctic wastes, along with a
helicopter full of no-nonsense Yanks, we do so as tourists, not residents.
From this point on, the film does exactly what you’d
expect, returning to the Hawks/Nyby The Thing from Another World for the
saucer discovery and thawing out and escape of the alien horror, then
essentially following the outlines of the Carpenter version (I mean, what do
you think is going to happen once the creature is loose?), right down to a
retread of the blood-test scene (although this time involving checking for
dental fillings instead).
There are some enjoyable effects; the blend of old school
prosthetics and CGI mostly works, as does a nod here and there to the 1982 film’s
‘look’. But, 30 years on, there’s no way these sequences can achieve the mind-boggling,
“You’ve got to be fucking kidding me!” impact of the original.
There are also, in place of Carpenter’s quickly and
effectively sketched character types, just too many damned people in this film.
Far from being lonesome and a long way from home, this research station is
packed to the gills – mostly, of course, with cheerful (well, not for long)
Norwegians – hulking men with beards and woolly hats who are, frankly,
indistinguishable from one another; so why should we what happens to them? Or
to the intrusive but equally dull Americans? Winstead’s can-do, ass-kicking
scientist ticks all the final girl boxes well enough, but adds no quirks or
insights to the template; she’s no substitute for Kurt Russell either.
And, finally, the much-vaunted desire to link this new Thing with the old one (yes, it ends with a dog being chased by a helicopter) also
fails – inexplicably, really – by simply not bothering to fill in a few
important details, thus satisfying no one. Carpenter’s The Thing was a clever, stripped down and terrifying updating of a
loveable, yet talky, 1951 classic; it brought new ideas and new scares to the
table. The 2011 Thing has neither ideas nor scares to offer us.
That’s not to say it’s all
bad – just empty-headed, tension-free, formulaic and pointless; and it’s really
just a remake without the balls to admit it.
Bookmark this post with: